Is india moving away from a secularist state
Problems of secularism in india
Needless to say, this incident was shameful. In such a situation, they anticipate the possibility that many regional parties could be persuaded to support an NDA government only if it is led by a less belligerent leader than Mr. Ashwini Anand was formerly a Founding Member of one of India's premier socio-political organizations. But it would be a dangerous mistake to believe that such a choice would pull India out of the dark abyss into which it has slipped. Before critics argue that the government spends a lot of money on providing pilgrims of the Amarnath Yatra or Kumbh Mela security I would submit that the provision of security to citizens is not a favour but a basic responsibility of any state. People of all religions, caste, community, race or creed can live peacefully practicing their belief. Shrill, divisive campaign Listen carefully to the speeches in the shrill summer election campaign which has just come to a halt. This outcome would also further imperil all left, liberal and democratic dissenting voices, in civil society, in the media, in universities, and in letters and the arts. As I write this, the questions - "In which universe is this fair? In a democratic country like ours, the citizens are given the freedom to preach and practice any religion they want- Christianity, Muslim, Hindu, Jainism, Buddhism. None are restricted to any one particular religion. It will signal that a significant majority of Hindus endorse the Hindu supremacist ideology of the RSS. Points to be put on regarding this Topic Updated: Dec 07, ,
It is a battle that must be waged with courage, with perseverance and with love. During the triple talaq debate in the Lok Sabha, the Trinamool Congress MPs maintained a studied silence, this despite the involvement of its local leaders in a simmering agitation to prevent state interference in Muslim personal laws.
Why was secularism adopted in india
However, even with such an outcome, the crusade against secular democracy waged with such vigour by the RSS will not be won. In India, however, people of different religion beliefs are covered by different laws. Akhlaq was lynched by a mob. The outcome of the Gujarat assembly election has been seen by the Congress as vindication of a new approach. The attempt to be seen as committed to gender justice and at the same time sensitive to organised Muslim pressure may well work momentarily. Interestingly, none of this applies to mosques, churches or gurudwaras. The most important of these is the realisation that any political identification with aggressive Muslim mobilisation can trigger a backlash that can only benefit the BJP. I further assert that the policies of the Indian state are nor just unsecular but smack of blatant religious reverse-discrimination against its majority community. This outcome would also further imperil all left, liberal and democratic dissenting voices, in civil society, in the media, in universities, and in letters and the arts. At roughly the same time, animal rights activist- Prashant Poojary, was brutally hacked to death in an equally shameful incident. Affirmative action or blatant reverse discrimination? Ashwini Anand was formerly a Founding Member of one of India's premier socio-political organizations.
Even with a more acceptable face, as with Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the RSS would use political power to further penetrate all institutions, and enfeeble what survives of secular practice. The Congress took exceptional care to ensure that the traditional support it received from the Muslim was kept well below the radar.
Needless to say, this incident was shameful.
Also Read The irrelevance of secularism In the RSS worldview, Muslims and Christians are not authentically Indian, their loyalty to the Indian nation is and will always remain suspect; therefore, they need to be tamed, to be continuously shown their subordinate status in the Indian polity and society.
India is today a wasteland of compassion.
Non secular countries
I am yet to see a report on any compensation paid to the family of Prashant Poojary by the state government. But by no means was it unprecedented. No outward pressure is forced upon him to follow any particular religion. A truly secular country would not subsidize any pilgrimage- period! Affirmative action or blatant reverse discrimination? No religion dominates any other. Discussion RE: Is India still a secular state? It will signal that a significant majority of Hindus endorse the Hindu supremacist ideology of the RSS. Modi would be welcome, they reason.
Every one making move towards the Good Indian people are more religious now a days.
based on 38 review