The promotion of violence throughout religions
As a result certain kinds of violence are condemned, and others are ignored. Thus the irrational came to mean the domination of religion in the historical period that preceded it.
If the definition is expanded to include such belief systems, then all sorts of practices, including many that are usually labeled "secular," fall under the definition of religion.
Religion uses rites and ceremonies, such as circumcision and baptism, and "[p]olitics also depends on rites and ceremonies," even in avowedly secular nations. An adequate approach to the problem would be resolutely empirical: under what conditions do certain beliefs and practices—jihad, the "invisible hand" of the market, the sacrificial atonement of Christ, the role of the United States as worldwide liberator—turn violent?
First, America often finds itself cast as a "secondary enemy. Religion has a peculiar tendency toward absolutism, says Wentz, but he casts a very wide net when considering religion.
Needless to say, this would be an unthinkable crime—as it would kill tens of millions of innocent civilians in a single day—but it may be the only course of action available to us, given what Islamists believe. Religious beliefs and practices came to be regarded as only expressions of personal convictions, not to be endorsed or enforced by state authority.
Relationship between religion and violence
Hostilities against Muslims and Jews also increased across Europe, as did threats against Hindus in more than 18 countries. Religion can cause all kinds of trouble in the public arena. He acknowledges, however, that "the history and scriptures of the world's religions tell stories of violence and war even as they speak of peace and love. One would think that he would draw the obvious conclusion that zealous nationalism can cause violence. Peace depends on a balanced view of violence and recognition that so-called secular ideologies and institutions can be just as prone to absolutism, divisiveness, and irrationality. Terrorism expert Martha Crenshaw suggests that religion is just a mask used by political movements to draw support. At times Juergensmeyer admits the difficulty of separating religious violence from mere political violence. According to Parekh, Although religion can make a valuable contribution to political life, it can also be a pernicious influence, as liberals rightly highlight.
But either way it is not rational. It spans intimidation, harassment and internment to terrorism and outright warfare. The Inquisition is described as a campaign to wipe out heretics and others -- motivated percent by religion.
Religious conflict examples
The Crusader is not really a Christian, for example, because he doesn't really understand the meaning of Christianity. Yet, to dislike America is one thing; to regard it as a cosmic enemy is quite another. But Christians eventually embraced tolerance through a long and complex historical process. They were, from the start, missionary religions. While not the exclusive preserve of faith-based groups, the conscious spread of values of empathy, compassion, forgiveness and altruism are needed today more than ever. The Incoherence of the Argument The English-speaking academic world has been inundated—especially since September 11, —by books and articles attempting to explain why religion has a peculiar tendency toward violence. It carries the meaning of physical force, violent language, fury, and, more importantly, forcible interference.
based on 46 review